if were all supose to be going green,then why do all the new houses not use wind power! that will kick globle warming up the…..neck
moslty cost.
plus here in texas we’re building new solar collector array power plants. It claims 100% efficiency, 100% self sustaining, 100% clean (water, salt, and sunlight) 100% available all of the time (clouds and night time don’t effect it) and can power 400,000 homes. (due for completion in 2012)
heres one in Euroupe.(its only 11mw texas will be 300mw)
http://judykitsune.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/solar-seville/
thats real sunlight
with wind you need a large amount of fans, constant winds all day every day, and an alternate power source for when there is no wind. Plus they are expensive.
regular solar, plus a few fans, plus underground temperature exchanges are the best ways to reduce your electrical usage to almost 15%, yet can get into the $100,000 range fairly quickly.
October 1st, 2009 at 12:47 pm
moslty cost.
plus here in texas we’re building new solar collector array power plants. It claims 100% efficiency, 100% self sustaining, 100% clean (water, salt, and sunlight) 100% available all of the time (clouds and night time don’t effect it) and can power 400,000 homes. (due for completion in 2012)
heres one in Euroupe.(its only 11mw texas will be 300mw)
http://judykitsune.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/solar-seville/
thats real sunlight
with wind you need a large amount of fans, constant winds all day every day, and an alternate power source for when there is no wind. Plus they are expensive.
regular solar, plus a few fans, plus underground temperature exchanges are the best ways to reduce your electrical usage to almost 15%, yet can get into the $100,000 range fairly quickly.
References :
October 1st, 2009 at 1:10 pm
It is not consistent.It is not sufficient.
References :
My research work.
October 1st, 2009 at 1:50 pm
It’s not efficient except in a very few specific locations. In a city or large town it’s a total waste of money (and resources).
References :